Proposed rule change for Juniors

1 reply [Last post]
WarrenG
WarrenG's picture
Offline
Last seen: 18 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 12/20/2005

The proposed rule about restrictions on juniors' equipment failed to pass at the USAC meetings this past weekend. In fact, the response was so overwhelmingly negative that I doubt the idea will be re-visited anytime soon.

No votes yet
Tad Borek
Tad Borek's picture
Offline
Last seen: 36 weeks 4 days ago
Joined: 08/16/2006
Re: Proposed rule change for Juniors

WarrenG wrote:The proposed rule about restrictions on juniors' equipment failed to pass at the USAC meetings this past weekend. In fact, the response was so overwhelmingly negative that I doubt the idea will be re-visited anytime soon.

This got talked about a good bit at the Local Association conference this past weekend. A lot of people did like the basic concept of avoiding wallet races in juniors but the rule had a lot of issues. One of course being that it wouldn't prevent anyone from spending a huge pile of cash on frame, group, and non-tubie rims/tires.

I was joking with some other LA reps that the proposed rule was secretly sponsored by Zipp, to help reinforce the impression that buying a $2,200 carbon wheelset might actually make a difference. Think of the marketing pitch, "So good it's banned in the juniors!" In reality, this stuff seems more likely to risk a walk back to the finish line if you race on anything but oval concrete (and based on Dunnigan, maybe even then).

-Tad

Zipp 303 - RIP Merco RR
Zipp 202 - RIP Dunnigan Hills RR
Nemesis - on order!
1983 Wolber - still spinning

Co-director, Golden Gate Velo

2013 © NCNCA | All rights reserved | http://ncnca.org/ | Contact the Webmaster
Northern California Nevada Cycling Association